Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Chapter 11 Questions

1) Ralph's group went to Jack's group to get Piggy's specs.
2) The twins notice Ralph's anger towards Jack.
3) Ralph's group still has morals while Jack's doesn't.
4) I think that perhaps Roger meant for the rock to hit everyone and finally end all of the chaos.
5) The conch represented the last hope for order and its destruction means that order and sensibility is no longer an option.
6) Most of the boys want a chief because a chief tells them what to do and helps them survive. He's basically like an adult figure to them.
7) What is you explanation for having the need to kill?
8) Diary Entry
    The island has gone from peacefully beautiful to savagely horrifying. The once clear waters have been stained with the blood of the innocent. The boys have all fallen as slaves to Jack. Some out of admiration for such strong leadership while others have done so out of fear and the need for survival.
    The island has both literally and metaphorically went up in flames. It has become a hell on earth. Simon and Piggy have both been murdered by the savages. Simon being beaten and Piggy being crushed by a monstrous rock. And the twins have been captured and forced to join Jack's group leaving Ralph all alone.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Chapter 10 Questions


  1. Ralph, Piggy, and Samneric all say that they didn't see the others kill Simon. They claim to have been on the outside of the circle which is a lie. "Don't let on we was in that dance. Not to Samneric" (Piggy 157). They just don't want to feel to blame for the death of Simon. Piggy convinces Ralph that they were scared and didn't know what to do and that Simon's death was an accident. "It was an accident"(Piggy 157).
  2. One difference between Ralph and Jack's explanation for Simon's death is Jack states that it was the beast in disguise and Ralph knows that it was Simon. "He came-disguised"(Jack 160).  Another difference is that Ralph now believes that it was an accident and Jack knows that it was intentional. "It was an accident"(Piggy 157).
  3. Based on Jack's order to have Wilfred beaten I can conclude that Jack has become completely savage and has gone crazy with killing. "I don't know. He didn't say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up"(Robert 159).

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Editorial Analysis

1) A problem that Betsy McCaughey identifies in her commentary is that four hospitals together can only treat eleven ebola patients.
2) The solution McCaughey offers is hospitals should be prepared to recognize possible ebola cases and isolate the patients immediately.
3) Sean Kaufman views the CDC's guidelines as "absolutely irresponsible and dead wrong".
4) The point that Michael Burgess made about CDC head Thomas Frieden was that wearing a head to toe suit is no help in protection from ebola because as soon as you remove the suit the vomit and other bodily fluids are on the suit. So when you remove the suit you become exposed to the illness.
5) a. I agree with her commentary because it is true. What is the purpose of having these facilities if they are not going to be used. 
b. My mom also agrees with her statements. 

Monday, February 9, 2015

Article Summary

In the article titled "Teen Arrested After Taking a Snapchat Selfie With Murder Victim's Body" Laura Stampler reveals the horrifying case of a sixteen year old boy murdering his classmate. First, Stampler states that the boys were from Pennsylvania and what the article will be about. Next, she informs us of the young man's charges which were criminal homicide, first-degree murder, and illegal possession of a handgun. Also, Stampler reports that the sixteen year old is being charged as an adult. In addition, she receives a statement from one of the police officers on the case. He states that the picture showed that the young boy was shot in the face and the caption was the murderers name clearly stating who he was. Finally, Stampler concludes by giving a link to go inside the lives of families affected by gun violence.
http://time.com/3700822/teen-murder-snapchat-selfie/

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Will Musical Training Make You More Successful?

I do believe that musical training can make you more successful. Although, it really depends on the person at hand. As far as singing goes I do believe that every singer should have some sort of musical training because you do develop more skill and better your technique. My opinion does waver with instruments though. Some individuals don’t really need musical training with instruments because it can come natural. I see how some may think that my logic is backwards, but actually it’s not. Everyone can sing, but few can sing good. Which is why musical training is a necessity for singers. Studies have shown that children as young as the age of three were able to play instruments with no sort of lessons. This is why I believe that as far as singing goes people should definitely have musical training, but with instruments it’s more about passion.
I have had musical training as a singer and I feel like I really learned and improved on my skills. We learned to match pitch and how to read music which in the long run is really helpful. Most importantly though and this really bothers me when I hear professionals not do this is we learned to articulate. So many famous and well known singer who have never had musical training don’t know these skills. Which is why I personally don’t listen to music that everybody likes. How can you consider someone a good singer if sometimes you don’t even know what they are saying because they don’t articulate. If it weren’t for websites like A to Z lyrics I wouldn’t know any of the lyrics to most songs because you can’t even understand the singer. This is why I believe that musical training for singers would help them me more successful.
Now for musical training on instruments. I feel that you don’t need musical training or lessons on how to play an instrument. I was about three years old when I first sat down in front of a piano. As I pressed the keys I wasn’t just making noise my mom came up to me and said that I was making music. I didn’t just bang on the keys like a normal three year old would. I gently pressed each key with care. I was later given a piano of my own and any melody that I heard in a movie or TV commercial I would go to my piano and teach myself how to play the melody with success. I have what is called an ear for music. Now I can play any song and I have never had musical training for the piano. This is the case for other kids as well. I believe that it is all about passion. You can have all the training in the world for a specific instrument, but if your not passionate about playing it than you will never be as good as someone who has never had training but absolutely puts all of their heart into playing it.
In conclusion, I do believe that musical training can benefit singers. Although for musicians it isn’t really necessary if you can play it as soon as you pick it up. If you do play an instrument and want to take lessons because you feel like you can improve than of course go for it. Although I personally tried taking piano lessons and I was bored. I taught myself just fine and didn’t feel like the lessons were important. Except even if you are told you are a good singer you should still take musical training because it really will benefit you and help you be more successful. 

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Latin Roots#7

Roots

  1. duc(t), duce: to lead
  2. fed(er), fid(e): faith; trust
  3. fin(e): end; limit
  4. flect, flex: to bend
Words
  1. aqueduct: a large pipe or other conduit made to bring water from a great distance
  2. conductive: tending to lead, help, assist, or result in
  3. definitive: completely accurate, reliable, and authoritative; decisive or conclusive
  4. fidelity: faithfulness to one's promises or obligations; steadfast faithfulness; technological faithfulness
  5. fiduciary: an individual who holds something in trust for another; a trustee
  6. finale: a "grand" conclusion, as of a performance; the last scene of a play
  7. finite: limited or bordered by time or by any measurement; measurable
  8. flexuous: winding in and out; bending and wavering
  9. inducement: anything used or given to persuade or motivate; an incentive
  10. inflection: a slight change in tone or modulation of the voice, as in a point of emphasis
  11. perfidious: characteristic of one who would intentionally betray a faith or trust; treacherous
  12. traduce: to speak falsely of; to slander or defame; to disgrace another's good name; to vilify
Sentences
  1. We learned about aqueducts in history.
  2. The teenager was conductive to the old lady everyday after school.
  3. Some people find the internet definitive even though sometimes it isn't.
  4. The marriage of the young couple was pure fidelity.
  5. Her granddaughter was the old ladies fiduciary.
  6. The finale of the play was the best part.
  7. After finding out that she was sick she knew that her life was finite.
  8. The pattern on the fabric was flexuous.
  9. The runners family acted as an inducement by waiting at the finish line.
  10. While acting the young actor spoke in an inflection tone to show that she was powerful.
  11. The family saw the fiancees true perfidious nature, but the young girl was too in love to reason.
  12. The love stricken girl thought her family was traduce towards her fiancee. 

Literary Analysis #3

The Battle Between Generations
In the novel The Joy Luck Club by Amy Tan there is eight characters, four mothers and four daughters. All of these character’s stories are about how things were different when they or their mother’s were younger. Each generation handled their problems different and had different ideas about certain things. One difference is that the mother’s couldn't just get a divorce when they no longer loved their husbands. Another difference is that the mother’s were raised to respect their mothers, but some decided to raise their daughters differently and allow them to have their own voice. This is one of the main reasons that the daughters didn't really take their mother’s life lessons and superstitions seriously.
The main difference of the generations is how they handled love. This is also due to the fact that they lived in different countries. Most of the mothers had arranged marriages and were raised to please their husbands. While the daughters married who they wanted and had a different mind set. They felt that they should be treated equal with their husbands. In addition the daughters were allowed to get a divorce if they were unhappy with their husbands. While the mother’s were taught to work things out or suffer through it.
As for raising children all eight of the characters felt the same way. Which is they didn't want to raise they’re children how they were raised. This way of thinking caused quite a conflict. Then again in reality everyone thinks that way. They use the way they were raised as an example of what to do and what not to do. The daughters felt that their mothers were silly and had strange ways of thinking, but sometimes those ways of thinking were smart and useful.
Another difference is the generations ideas of family. The mother’s were raised to always do good to make their family proud. Also that they had couldn't disgrace the family otherwise they would be shunned. This happened to An-Mei Hsu’s mother. She was no longer welcome to the family after she disgraced it which was quite sad. This made the mother’s raise their own daughters to know that they would love them no matter what and they proved that. They were always there when their daughters needed them. Although many of the daughters didn't see it this way and often disliked being around their mothers. They did have a similar idea of family which is that the daughters were to take care of their parents in their old age. Most of the characters did exactly that no matter how much they couldn't stand their mothers.
In conclusion, the different generations do have different ideas and ways of dealing with issues, but in the end they all used the generation before them as an example. They did have some similarities though. Such as raising their children and about the importance of family. In the long run these ways of thinking are what kept the families together.